msg264721 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-03 13:37 |
test_concurrent_futures fails on an android emulator running an x86 system image at API level 21.
There are multiple ERRORs, all resulting in the same traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/test/test_concurrent_futures.py", line 68, in setU
p
self.executor = self.executor_type(max_workers=self.worker_count)
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/concurrent/futures/process.py", line 390, in __init__
EXTRA_QUEUED_CALLS)
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 101, in Queue
return Queue(maxsize, ctx=self.get_context())
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 42, in __init__
self._rlock = ctx.Lock()
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 66, in Lock
return Lock(ctx=self.get_context())
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 163, in __in
it__
SemLock.__init__(self, SEMAPHORE, 1, 1, ctx=ctx)
File "/sdcard/org.bitbucket.pyona/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 60, in __ini
t__
unlink_now)
OSError: [Errno 38] Function not implemented
The ERRORs:
===========
test_duplicate_futures (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolAsCompletedTests) ... ERROR
test_no_timeout (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolAsCompletedTests) ... ERROR
test_zero_timeout (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolAsCompletedTests) ... ERROR
test_killed_child (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_map (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_map_chunksize (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_map_exception (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_map_timeout (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_max_workers_negative (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_no_stale_references (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_shutdown_race_issue12456 (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_submit (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_submit_keyword (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_traceback (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolExecutorTest) ... ERROR
test_context_manager_shutdown (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolShutdownTest) ... ERROR
test_del_shutdown (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolShutdownTest) ... ERROR
test_hang_issue12364 (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolShutdownTest) ... ERROR
test_interpreter_shutdown (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolShutdownTest) ... ERROR
test_processes_terminate (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolShutdownTest) ... ERROR
test_run_after_shutdown (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolShutdownTest) ... ERROR
test_all_completed (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
test_first_completed (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
test_first_completed_some_already_completed (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
test_first_exception (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
test_first_exception_one_already_failed (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
test_first_exception_some_already_complete (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
test_timeout (test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolWaitTests) ... ERROR
|
msg264796 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-04 09:06 |
On android:
root@generic_x86:/data/local/tmp # python
Python 3.6.0a0 (default:811ccdee6f87+, May 4 2016, 10:31:14)
[GCC 4.9 20140827 (prerelease)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from _multiprocessing import sem_unlink
>>> sem_unlink('foo')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
OSError: [Errno 38] Function not implemented
>>>
|
msg264802 - (view) |
Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2016-05-04 10:59 |
It normally should raise an ImportError if sem_unlink is not available. Could you try the attached patch please?
|
msg264824 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-04 15:15 |
Patch tested, it does not fix the problem.
This is because in pyconfig.h:
/* Define to 1 if you have the `sem_unlink' function. */
#define HAVE_SEM_UNLINK 1
Android declares the function but does not implement it. This is not the only case, for example issue #26857.
|
msg265075 - (view) |
Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 16:11 |
Thanks for testing. Here is a new patch.
|
msg265079 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 17:00 |
Here is the result of the test:
root@generic_x86:/data/local/tmp # python -m test -v test_concurrent_futures
== CPython 3.6.0a0 (default:811ccdee6f87+, May 7 2016, 18:51:28) [GCC 4.9 20140827 (prerelease)]
== Linux-3.4.67+-i686-with-libc little-endian
== hash algorithm: fnv 32bit
== /data/local/tmp/test_python_2024
Testing with flags: sys.flags(debug=0, inspect=0, interactive=0, optimize=0, dont_write_bytecode=0, no_user_site=0, no_site=0, ignore_environment=0, verbose=0, bytes_warning=0, quiet=0, hash_randomization=1, isolated=0)
Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 [1/1] test_concurrent_futures
test_concurrent_futures skipped -- This platform lacks a functioning sem_open implementation, therefore, the required synchronization primitives needed will not function, see issue 3770.
1 test skipped:
test_concurrent_futures
Total duration: 0:00:01
|
msg265080 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 17:01 |
> Here is the result of the test:
I meant, results with the new patch.
|
msg265082 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) |
Date: 2016-05-07 17:38 |
New changeset 1030aa8357a7 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue #26924: Do not define _multiprocessing.sem_unlink under Android
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1030aa8357a7
|
msg265083 - (view) |
Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 17:39 |
Thanks, Xavier.
|
msg265084 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) |
Date: 2016-05-07 18:13 |
New changeset eee959fee5f5 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue #26924: Fix Windows buildbots
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eee959fee5f5
|
msg265085 - (view) |
Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 18:17 |
Xavier, could you try this alternative patch?
|
msg265090 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 19:19 |
Attached the results with sem_unlink_alt.diff.
|
msg265091 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 19:52 |
There is a typo in sem_unlink_alt.diff, not in the patch itself but in the neighbouring lines. In Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c, it should be, I think, after one does 's/define sem_unlink(name)/define SEM_UNLINK(name)/':
@@ -194,8 +194,8 @@
# define SEM_FAILED ((sem_t *)-1)
#endif
-#ifndef HAVE_SEM_UNLINK
-# define sem_unlink(name) 0
+#if !defined(HAVE_SEM_UNLINK) || defined(__ANDROID__)
+# define SEM_UNLINK(name) 0
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_SEM_TIMEDWAIT
But applying this new patch, gives exactly the same results. Maybe it is not just sem_unlink() that is not implemented. I will run a gdb session to find out.
|
msg265092 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 20:31 |
sem_open() is not implemented as well. Here is a gdb session with a breakpoint set at semlock_new() (SEM_FAILED is NULL on android):
Breakpoint 1, semlock_new (type=0xb6d070c0 <_PyMp_SemLockType>,
args=(1, 1, 1, '/mp-dkzrq4ed', True), kwds=0x0)
at /home/xavier/src/packages/android/cpython/Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c:420
420 {
(gdb) next
428 if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "iiisi", kwlist,
(gdb)
432 if (kind != RECURSIVE_MUTEX && kind != SEMAPHORE) {
(gdb)
437 if (!unlink) {
(gdb)
424 char *name, *name_copy = NULL;
(gdb)
445 handle = SEM_CREATE(name, value, maxvalue);
(gdb)
447 if (handle == SEM_FAILED || SEM_GET_LAST_ERROR() != 0)
(gdb) print handle
$5 = (SEM_HANDLE) 0x0
(gdb) next
460 if (handle != SEM_FAILED)
(gdb)
462 PyMem_Free(name_copy);
(gdb)
463 _PyMp_SetError(NULL, MP_STANDARD_ERROR);
(gdb)
464 return NULL;
(gdb)
This is run with sem_unlink_alt.diff modified to include the change to 'define SEM_UNLINK(name) 0' although I guess this does not change anything.
Sorry for misleading you about sem_unlink().
|
msg265093 - (view) |
Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2016-05-07 20:59 |
Thanks! Perhaps we should not set HAVE_SEM_* to 1 if we are on Android in the configure step.
|
msg265129 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-08 11:16 |
Undefining the SEM_* macros in multiprocessing.h when __ANDROID__ is set, would allow for an easier update when those functions become implemented at a future API level. The __ANDROID_API__ macro can be used for that purpose. For example, if this happens at API 24, this could be a changed to:
#if defined(__ANDROID__)
# include <android/api-level.h>
# if __ANDROID_API__ < 24
# undef sem_open
# ...
# endif
#endif
|
msg265130 - (view) |
Author: Xavier de Gaye (xdegaye) * |
Date: 2016-05-08 11:19 |
> # undef sem_open
I meant of course:
# undef HAVE_SEM_OPEN
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-04-11 14:58:30 | admin | set | github: 71111 |
2016-11-11 20:01:47 | davin | set | nosy:
+ davin
|
2016-05-21 07:06:39 | xdegaye | link | issue26865 dependencies |
2016-05-10 16:06:01 | berker.peksag | link | issue26925 superseder |
2016-05-08 11:19:09 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg265130 |
2016-05-08 11:16:20 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg265129 |
2016-05-07 20:59:06 | berker.peksag | set | messages:
+ msg265093 |
2016-05-07 20:31:24 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg265092 |
2016-05-07 19:52:46 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg265091 |
2016-05-07 19:19:48 | xdegaye | set | files:
+ sem_unlink_alt_output.txt
messages:
+ msg265090 |
2016-05-07 18:17:30 | berker.peksag | set | files:
+ sem_unlink_alt.diff
messages:
+ msg265085 |
2016-05-07 18:13:25 | python-dev | set | messages:
+ msg265084 |
2016-05-07 17:39:40 | berker.peksag | set | status: open -> closed messages:
+ msg265083
components:
+ Extension Modules, - Library (Lib), Cross-Build resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
2016-05-07 17:38:54 | python-dev | set | nosy:
+ python-dev messages:
+ msg265082
|
2016-05-07 17:01:53 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg265080 |
2016-05-07 17:00:08 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg265079 |
2016-05-07 16:11:18 | berker.peksag | set | files:
+ sem_unlink_v2.diff
messages:
+ msg265075 stage: patch review |
2016-05-04 15:15:36 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg264824 |
2016-05-04 10:59:48 | berker.peksag | set | files:
+ sem_unlink.diff
nosy:
+ berker.peksag messages:
+ msg264802
keywords:
+ patch |
2016-05-04 09:06:16 | xdegaye | set | messages:
+ msg264796 |
2016-05-03 13:37:56 | xdegaye | create | |