Author brandtbucher
Recipients BTaskaya, Daniel Moisset, brandtbucher, gvanrossum, kj, laurenjl, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal, rhettinger, willingc, xtreak
Date 2021-03-03.18:56:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1614797807.07.0.152970016883.issue42128@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Yeah, probably.

I'm not too familiar with the design of those objects... would it make more sense to have the implementation be a single descriptor shared by all derived types, or should we precompute the tuple of strings when each new type is defined?

I'm also not entirely sure how "unnamed fields" work, or what they're used for. Presumably we'd want to end the __match_args__ tuple upon hitting one of these?
History
Date User Action Args
2021-03-03 18:56:47brandtbuchersetrecipients: + brandtbucher, gvanrossum, rhettinger, willingc, Daniel Moisset, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal, xtreak, BTaskaya, kj, laurenjl
2021-03-03 18:56:47brandtbuchersetmessageid: <1614797807.07.0.152970016883.issue42128@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-03 18:56:47brandtbucherlinkissue42128 messages
2021-03-03 18:56:47brandtbuchercreate