Author gphemsley
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson, berker.peksag, christian.heimes, docs@python, eli.bendersky, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gphemsley, martin.panter, ncoghlan, rhettinger
Date 2020-06-13.23:47:48
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Content still lists the 'u' string formatting option, described as "Obsolete type – it is identical to 'd'." and linking to PEP 237.

However, testing indicates that Python 3 does not support a 'u' option and my archaeology suggests that such support was removed in Python 2.4. It seems this has flown under the radar for quite some time.
Date User Action Args
2020-06-13 23:47:49gphemsleysetrecipients: + gphemsley, georg.brandl, rhettinger, ncoghlan, christian.heimes, alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eli.bendersky, docs@python, berker.peksag, martin.panter
2020-06-13 23:47:49gphemsleysetmessageid: <>
2020-06-13 23:47:49gphemsleylinkissue40971 messages
2020-06-13 23:47:48gphemsleycreate