➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2020-06-13 23:47 by gphemsley, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg371474 - (view) | Author: Gordon P. Hemsley (gphemsley) * | Date: 2020-06-13 23:47 | |
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#old-string-formatting still lists the 'u' string formatting option, described as "Obsolete type – it is identical to 'd'." and linking to PEP 237. However, testing indicates that Python 3 does not support a 'u' option and my archaeology suggests that such support was removed in Python 2.4. It seems this has flown under the radar for quite some time. |
|||
| msg371666 - (view) | Author: Shubham Upreti (shubh07) * | Date: 2020-06-16 15:06 | |
Should i take this issue? |
|||
| msg372675 - (view) | Author: Petr Viktorin (petr.viktorin) *  |
Date: 2020-06-30 09:33 | |
AFAICS, Python 3 suports '%u' for printf-style formatting: Python 3.8.3 (default, May 29 2020, 00:00:00) [GCC 10.1.1 20200507 (Red Hat 10.1.1-1)] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> '%u' % 6 '6' What am I missing? |
|||
| msg372685 - (view) | Author: Petr Viktorin (petr.viktorin) * |
Date: 2020-06-30 12:25 | |
I'm closing the issue. Please comment or reopen if I missed something. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:32 | admin | set | github: 85143 |
| 2020-06-30 12:25:50 | petr.viktorin | set | status: open -> closed resolution: not a bug messages: + msg372685 stage: needs patch -> resolved |
| 2020-06-30 09:33:37 | petr.viktorin | set | nosy:
+ petr.viktorin messages: + msg372675 |
| 2020-06-16 15:06:32 | shubh07 | set | nosy:
+ shubh07 messages: + msg371666 |
| 2020-06-15 23:28:34 | benjamin.peterson | set | keywords:
+ easy stage: needs patch |
| 2020-06-13 23:47:49 | gphemsley | create | |