Message357368
-1 I don't think this would be an improvement. We already have a builtin callable() function documented, and we have the documented Callable() abstract base class, and the __call__ method is documented in the library reference. I don't we need yet another entry describing a straight-forward concept. Also I don't think we should litter the rest of docs with a link to a term-callable everytime we use the wordl. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-11-23 09:32:53 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, docs@python, Delgan |
2019-11-23 09:32:53 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1574501573.18.0.637247652823.issue38900@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-11-23 09:32:53 | rhettinger | link | issue38900 messages |
2019-11-23 09:32:53 | rhettinger | create | |
|