Hi.

Quick use case explanation about this: I would like to document my function, stating that it accepts any "callable" object and linking to a proper definition of such object.

For example, I'm already doing this when my function accepts a "file object". There exists no such type I can link to, so I link to the glossary definition: https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-file-object

I could link to the "callable()" built-in but than does not reflect well the expected *type* of the argument. For now, I define the argument as a "function" ( https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-function ) but this is too restrictive.

The definition for "callable" would be pretty straightforward, just mentioning it should implement "__call__", also linking to "emulating callable object" ( https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#emulating-callable-objects ) and / or the "callable()" builtin ( https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#callable ).

-1 I don't think this would be an improvement.  We already have a builtin callable() function documented, and we have the documented Callable() abstract base class, and the __call__ method is documented in the library reference.  I don't we need yet another entry describing a straight-forward concept.  Also I don't think we should litter the rest of docs with a link to a term-callable everytime we use the wordl.

I agree, it's straightforward. I just thought it could be useful to have a proper definition in the official documentation.

For example, this question on StackOverflow actually received many views: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/111234/what-is-a-callable

What do you think is the best documentation entry I can link to while mentioning a "callable" type? Just the builtin "callable()"? The `collections.abc.Callable` is interesting but does not look very appropriate for basic functions.

I suggest linking to the built-in callable() function:  https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#callable