➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author veky
Recipients ezio.melotti, malin, mrabarnett, serhiy.storchaka, veaba, veky
Date 2019-10-25.06:51:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1571986277.71.0.0947007010349.issue38582@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
I have no problem with long regexes. But those are not only long, those must be _deeply nested_ regexes, where simply 100 is an arbitrary limit. I'm quite sure if you really need depth 100, you must also need a dynamic depth of nesting, which you cannot really achieve with regexes.

Yes, if there is a will to change this, supporting \g would be a way to go.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-10-25 06:51:17vekysetrecipients: + veky, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, serhiy.storchaka, malin, veaba
2019-10-25 06:51:17vekysetmessageid: <1571986277.71.0.0947007010349.issue38582@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-10-25 06:51:17vekylinkissue38582 messages
2019-10-25 06:51:17vekycreate