This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jab
Recipients Dima.Tisnek, JelleZijlstra, davide.rizzo, giampaolo.rodola, jab, jmehnle, yselivanov
Date 2019-03-04.15:49:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1551714545.8.0.614961108709.issue31861@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
If the deciders prefer to have these in the operator module for 3.8 (as Yury and Jelle requested above), my PR from a few months ago which implements this (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/8895) can still be merged with no conflicts. I don't think any other changes to that patch are requested before it can be merged (i.e. it's only stalled on the decision whether to add these to builtins or operator), but I can still make time to address any new requested code changes if these are to go in operator.

If these are to go in builtins instead, @nanjekyejoannah has volunteered to pick that up. So it seems like this can move forward one way or the other once we have a decision on operator vs. builtins.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-03-04 15:49:05jabsetrecipients: + jab, giampaolo.rodola, davide.rizzo, jmehnle, Dima.Tisnek, yselivanov, JelleZijlstra
2019-03-04 15:49:05jabsetmessageid: <1551714545.8.0.614961108709.issue31861@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-03-04 15:49:05jablinkissue31861 messages
2019-03-04 15:49:05jabcreate