Message129875
Looks like this should've been done against the py3k branch instead. Looking at py3k, it's changed quite a bit since the last merge into py3k-jit.
Perhaps there is a better way to do this under py3k? Or it's handled already? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-02 11:21:55 | jszakmeister | set | recipients:
+ jszakmeister, tarek, eric.araujo |
2011-03-02 11:21:55 | jszakmeister | set | messageid: <1299064915.34.0.1639721967.issue11370@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-03-02 11:21:54 | jszakmeister | link | issue11370 messages |
2011-03-02 11:21:54 | jszakmeister | create | |
|