The compiler currently requires the code-generation functions to explicitly specify where basic blocks end, with a NEXT_BLOCK().

If you get that wrong, you get an exception about "malformed control flow graph" later, in the cfg analysis stage. It is not obvious then where the error is, and it makes it difficult to make changes in the compiler. 

We can instead make the compiler implicitly create a new block when this is needed (which is after specific opcodes).

The patch in PR31448 delays the creation of an implicit block to when it is needed (do if we begin using another block before a new instruction is added, the implicit block is never created). 

I counted how many empty blocks are being detected by the optimizer during "python -m test" and this number went down from 41798 (for main) to 35405 (for my PR), which shows that it is not only a theoretical possibility but actually happens. It would be things like:

NEXT_BLOCK()
VISIT_SEQ(c, stmt, s->v.Try.orelse);
compiler_use_next_block(c, end);

where the orelse block is empty.


In summary, the patch simplifies the code as well as making it more efficient.

New changeset c579243eb62d3182c84004cd72dcf6ef59100643 by Irit Katriel in branch 'main':
bpo-46808: remove NEXT_BLOCK() from compile.c (GH-31448)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c579243eb62d3182c84004cd72dcf6ef59100643