➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2022-01-13 08:18 by xoph, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 30596 | open | xoph, 2022-01-14 10:07 | |
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg410466 - (view) | Author: xoph (xoph) * | Date: 2022-01-13 08:24 | |
asyncio.create_subprocess_exec and asyncio.create_subprocess_shell fail with "No such device or address" when called on a program that attempts to invoke `/dev/stdin` on Linux. This happens in contrast to the subprocess module and was discussed in the this thread: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70624413/how-to-read-from-dev-stdin-with-asyncio-create-subprocess-exec It seems while subprocess uses a pipe, asyncio uses socket.socketpair() to communicate with the subprocess which in turn appears to fail for `/dev/stdin` |
|||
| msg410467 - (view) | Author: Andrew Svetlov (asvetlov) *  |
Date: 2022-01-13 08:35 | |
True. Would you make a pull request that uses socketpair on AIX only? A test for desired behavior is required. |
|||
| msg412297 - (view) | Author: xoph (xoph) * | Date: 2022-02-01 18:11 | |
Created a PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30596 It's ready for review. Happy about any feedback! |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:54 | admin | set | github: 90522 |
| 2022-02-01 18:11:58 | xoph | set | messages: + msg412297 |
| 2022-01-14 10:07:52 | xoph | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request28794 |
| 2022-01-13 08:35:50 | asvetlov | set | messages: + msg410467 |
| 2022-01-13 08:24:51 | xoph | set | messages: + msg410466 |
| 2022-01-13 08:18:32 | xoph | create | |