Created on 2021-01-12 01:27 by ethan.furman, last changed 2021-02-08 12:41 by hroncok. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 24196 | merged | ethan.furman, 2021-01-12 04:38 | |
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg384875 - (view) | Author: Ethan Furman (ethan.furman) *  |
Date: 2021-01-12 01:27 | |
In discussions about moving the calls to `__set_name__` and `__init_subclass__`, Nick Coughlan made an observation: Nick Coghlan: > Both EnumMeta and ABCMeta should probably be relying on `__set_name__` > for their per-member set up work these days, rather than deferring that > work until after `__new__` returns. By having `__set_name__` create the final members, they will be in place for the call to `__init_subclass__`. |
|||
| msg385006 - (view) | Author: Ethan Furman (ethan.furman) * |
Date: 2021-01-13 07:48 | |
New changeset c314e60388282d9829762fb6c30b12e2807caa19 by Ethan Furman in branch 'master': bpo-42901: [Enum] move member creation to `__set_name__` (GH-24196) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c314e60388282d9829762fb6c30b12e2807caa19 |
|||
| msg386629 - (view) | Author: Miro Hrončok (hroncok) * | Date: 2021-02-08 12:41 | |
I found a possible regression: https://bugs.python.org/issue43162 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-02-08 12:41:34 | hroncok | set | nosy:
+ hroncok messages: + msg386629 |
| 2021-01-25 23:13:30 | ethan.furman | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2021-01-13 07:48:08 | ethan.furman | set | messages: + msg385006 |
| 2021-01-12 04:38:09 | ethan.furman | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_requests: + pull_request23022 |
| 2021-01-12 01:29:46 | ethan.furman | link | issue42775 superseder |
| 2021-01-12 01:27:28 | ethan.furman | create | |