Title: Use proper class markup for random.Random docs
Type: enhancement Stage: patch review
Components: Documentation Versions: Python 3.8, Python 3.7, Python 3.6
Status: open Resolution:
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: rhettinger Nosy List: berker.peksag, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rhettinger
Priority: low Keywords: easy, patch

Created on 2018-06-06 14:22 by ncoghlan, last changed 2018-06-20 08:31 by mbussonn.

Pull Requests
URL Status Linked Edit
PR 7817 open mbussonn, 2018-06-20 08:31
Messages (2)
msg318827 - (view) Author: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-06-06 14:22
Talking to Berker on I noticed that docs for random.Random are currently embedded in the module preamble text for and hence really easy to miss.

It would be good if they were broken out into a proper Sphix class directive so that the fact you can create your own dedicated pseudorandom number generators for specific purposes is easier to see on a quick scan of the docs.
msg318871 - (view) Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-06-07 01:00
Thanks, I'll add a separate entry for the random.Random() class.
Date User Action Args
2018-06-20 08:31:04mbussonnsetkeywords: + patch
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_requests: + pull_request7425
2018-06-07 01:00:27rhettingersetpriority: normal -> low

messages: + msg318871
components: + Documentation
2018-06-06 18:18:30serhiy.storchakasetassignee: rhettinger

nosy: + rhettinger, mark.dickinson
2018-06-06 14:22:42ncoghlancreate