Error reporting for recursive backreferences in regexes isn't consistent across both types of backref. Here's the exception for a recursive numeric backref:

>>> import re
>>> re.compile(r'(\1)')
Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
sre_constants.error: cannot refer to an open group at position 1

Here's what I'm seeing on the 3.5 branch for a named backref:

>>> re.compile(r'(?P<spam>(?P=spam))')
Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded

Which is an improvement over 3.4 and below, where compilation succeeds and appears to treat (?P=spam) as valid but unmatchable.

Here is a patch that forbids symbolic references to opened groups in 3.5+.

It is questionable if an exception should be raised in older Python versions. Here is a patch for 3.4 that just issues a warning.

New changeset 361d7af9396e by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.5':
Issue #24580: Symbolic group references to open group in re patterns now are
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/361d7af9396e

New changeset 4d3557500019 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Issue #24580: Symbolic group references to open group in re patterns now are
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4d3557500019

It is too late for 3.4, and I left 2.7 as is. Reopen issue if you think that it is worth to add a warning to 2.7.