The csv.writer.writerow() does not accept a generator as input. I find this counter-intuitive and against the spirit of similar APIs. If the generator is coerced to a list, everything works as expected. See the following test script which fails on the line "w.writerow(g)". In my opinion, this line should work identically to the line "w.writerow(list(g))".

---
import csv

f = open('foo.csv', 'w')
w = csv.writer(f)
g = (i for i in ['a', 'b', 'c'])
w.writerow(list(g))
g = (i for i in ['a', 'b', 'c'])
w.writerow(g)
---

This seems like a sensible enhancement request to me.

It is possible it could even be considered a bug, the docs aren't exactly clear on what 'row' is expected to be.

I have created an initial patch such that writerow() now allows generators. I have also added a unit test to demonstrate the fix.

The code now coerces iterators (and generators) to a list, then operates on the result. I would have preferred to simply iterate over the argument, however, there is a special case where the length of the argument is exactly 1. So coercing to a list makes checking the length simpler.

All feedback welcome.

Hmm.  That could be an issue.  If someone passes a generator they will generally expect it to be consumed as a generator, not turned into a list implicitly.  So it may be better to turn this into a doc bug and require the explicit "list" call :(.

The docs mention that "row" should be a sequence, so there is no a bug.

Here is a patch which makes writerow() accept an iterable without converting it to a list. It also adds tests for few corner cases and fixes the docs.

Left a question about handling of the unquoted empty field exception on Rietveld.

New changeset cf5b62036445 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Issue #23171: csv.Writer.writerow() now supports arbitrary iterables.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cf5b62036445

Looks like Serhiy forgot to close this, so closing it.

No, I just had a stale tab :( :(