msg215307 - (view) |
Author: Jonas Wagner (Sjlver) * |
Date: 2014-04-01 12:11 |
CPython fails to build with LLVM's link-time optimization (LTO) in Mac OS. Very similar commands work on Linux.
I'm currently configuring CPython as follows:
on Linux:
RANLIB="ar -s --plugin=/path/to/llvm/lib/LLVMgold.so" CC=/path/to/llvm/bin/clang CXX=/path/to/llvm/bin/clang++ CFLAGS="-g -flto" LDFLAGS="-flto" ./configure
on Mac OS:
CC=/path/to/llvm/bin/clang CXX=/path/to/llvm/bin/clang++ CFLAGS="-g -flto" LDFLAGS="-flto" ./configure
The RANLIB variable should not be needed on Mac, because its toolchain does not need a GOLD plugin.
On Linux, the above builds correctly and passes most of the test suite. On Mac, I receive the following error (similar for other extensions):
building '_scproxy' extension
/usr/bin/clang -Wno-unused-result -Werror=declaration-after-statement -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -g -flto -I../cpython/Include -I. -I/usr/local/include -I../cpython/Include -I../cpython-lto-build -c ../cpython/Modules/_scproxy.c -o build/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-3.5/path/to/cpython/Modules/_scproxy.o
/usr/bin/clang -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -flto build/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-3.5/path/to/cpython/Modules/_scproxy.o -L/usr/local/lib -o build/lib.macosx-10.9-x86_64-3.5/_scproxy.so -framework SystemConfiguration -framework CoreFoundation
*** WARNING: renaming "_scproxy" since importing it failed: dlopen(build/lib.macosx-10.9-x86_64-3.5/_scproxy.so, 2): Symbol not found: __Py_NoneStruct
Referenced from: build/lib.macosx-10.9-x86_64-3.5/_scproxy.so
Expected in: flat namespace
in build/lib.macosx-10.9-x86_64-3.5/_scproxy.so
|
msg215311 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * |
Date: 2014-04-01 13:16 |
What is your clang version? See also issue #20767.
|
msg215314 - (view) |
Author: Jonas Wagner (Sjlver) * |
Date: 2014-04-01 13:20 |
I am indeed using Clang 3.4 (both the one that ships with Mac OS, and a version compiled from the sources).
However, the errors I get are rather different than #20767. In particular, Clang finishes successfully and does produce shared object files; they just don't seem to be loadable.
|
msg215344 - (view) |
Author: Ned Deily (ned.deily) * |
Date: 2014-04-01 22:33 |
Just as an experiment (using the 3.4 branch and the Xcode 5.1 clang), the list of unique symbols not found during the test dlopen in setup.py when using -flto:
_PyArg_ParseTuple
_PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords
_PyBaseObject_Type
_PyBool_Type
_PyByteArray_Type
_PyBytes_Type
_PyCFunction_Type
_PyExc_AssertionError
_PyExc_BufferError
_PyExc_EOFError
_PyExc_IndexError
_PyExc_IOError
_PyExc_KeyError
_PyExc_LookupError
_PyExc_MemoryError
_PyExc_NotImplementedError
_PyExc_OSError
_PyExc_OverflowError
_PyExc_RuntimeError
_PyExc_TypeError
_PyExc_ValueError
_PyModule_Create2
__Py_NoneStruct
Anyone see a pattern there?
Do we know if anyone has tried to use LTO with a Python build previously? I've never tried it myself and there certainly could be ld and/or dyld differences on OS X. Also, some thought would need to go into and tests developed to see what the performance trade-offs are. For example, I could imagine that LTO might be have more impact if the standard library extension modules were statically linked, e.g. via Modules/Setup*. And there are at least three separate current build configurations to consider on OS X: unshared, --enable-shared, --enable-framework. One would need to look at things like what effect these all have on memory and shared memory footprints as well as cpu resources and real time, with and without LTO and/or other optimizations. It certainly would be an interesting project for someone with the interest and time.
Potentially supporting LTO seems to me to be more of a feature than a bug so I think should be considered a 3.5 issue, at least initially.
|
msg215362 - (view) |
Author: Jonas Wagner (Sjlver) * |
Date: 2014-04-02 07:55 |
Thanks Ned, this is interesting!
I don't know about Mac OS, but on Ubuntu, LTO and PGO apparently make Python around 10% faster (see #17781). However, that data point refers to GCC's LTO, not LLVM's.
Personally I'm interested in LTO because I want to obtain whole-program LLVM bitcode files (for use in a research project about instrumentation). However, if there is something I can help (e.g., running benchmarks with different compilation settings), let me know.
|
msg215364 - (view) |
Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * |
Date: 2014-04-02 09:14 |
I've used -O4 for extensions in the past (which until recently implied LTO) and that worked fine.
I'm pretty sure that I haven't used LTO for python itself, apart from a some tests with an early version llvm-gcc where using LTO for building python used to crash the compiler :-)
BTW. There's no clear pattern in the missing symbols. The missing symbols for global functions could be due to aggressive inlining (and then deciding that the standalone function isn't needed anymore), but that is fairly unlikely and wouldn't explain the missing data symbols.
|
msg215366 - (view) |
Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * |
Date: 2014-04-02 09:19 |
Have you tried the -export_dynamic option for ld(1):
-export_dynamic
Preserves all global symbols in main executables during LTO. Without this option, Link Time Optimization is allowed to inline and remove global functions. This
option is used when a main executable may load a plug-in which requires certain symbols from the main executable.
|
msg215367 - (view) |
Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * |
Date: 2014-04-02 09:33 |
This works for me (with a separate build directory):
CC=clang CXX=clang++ CFLAGS="-g -flto" LDFLAGS="-flto -Wl,-export_dynamic" ../configure
This is on OSX 10.9.2, with Xcode 5.1, and clang --version says:
$ clang --version
Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.38) (based on LLVM 3.4svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0
Thread model: posix
Tests are still running, but so far there are no unexpected failures.
|
msg215522 - (view) |
Author: Jonas Wagner (Sjlver) * |
Date: 2014-04-04 13:50 |
I confirm that this also works with my self-compiled Clang 3.4. -export_dynamic was the missing option.
Is a good place to document this?
Otherwise, I think this issue can be closed. Thanks a lot for the help!
|
msg226645 - (view) |
Author: Jonas Wagner (Sjlver) * |
Date: 2014-09-09 16:37 |
No response for a while, and problem solved... closing.
|
msg274278 - (view) |
Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * |
Date: 2016-09-02 22:34 |
Here is a patch to turn on `-Wl,-export_dynamic` when building with LTO. Unfortunately I have a bunch of tests that fail when running with LTO+PGO of the form of:
[ 95/398] test_bytes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/brettcannon/Repositories/python/cpython/3.5/Lib/runpy.py", line 193, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", mod_spec)
File "/Users/brettcannon/Repositories/python/cpython/3.5/Lib/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "/Users/brettcannon/Repositories/python/cpython/3.5/Lib/test/__main__.py", line 3, in <module>
regrtest.main_in_temp_cwd()
File "/Users/brettcannon/Repositories/python/cpython/3.5/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 1593, in main_in_temp_cwd
main()
File "/Users/brettcannon/Repositories/python/cpython/3.5/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 756, in main
raise Exception("Child error on {}: {}".format(test, result[1]))
Exception: Child error on test_bytes: Exit code -6
|
msg274639 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) |
Date: 2016-09-06 22:10 |
New changeset cc5f8179a7ba by Ned Deily in branch 'default':
Issue #21122: Fix LTO builds on OS X.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cc5f8179a7ba
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-04-11 14:58:01 | admin | set | github: 65321 |
2016-09-06 23:22:25 | brett.cannon | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed |
2016-09-06 22:10:02 | python-dev | set | nosy:
+ python-dev messages:
+ msg274639
|
2016-09-02 22:34:59 | brett.cannon | set | components:
+ macOS |
2016-09-02 22:34:46 | brett.cannon | set | status: closed -> open files:
+ issue21122.diff messages:
+ msg274278
keywords:
+ patch resolution: fixed -> (no value) |
2016-09-02 21:58:08 | brett.cannon | link | issue26359 dependencies |
2014-09-09 16:37:46 | Sjlver | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages:
+ msg226645
|
2014-04-04 13:50:46 | Sjlver | set | messages:
+ msg215522 |
2014-04-02 09:33:14 | ronaldoussoren | set | messages:
+ msg215367 |
2014-04-02 09:19:16 | ronaldoussoren | set | messages:
+ msg215366 |
2014-04-02 09:14:40 | ronaldoussoren | set | messages:
+ msg215364 |
2014-04-02 07:55:52 | Sjlver | set | messages:
+ msg215362 |
2014-04-01 22:33:52 | ned.deily | set | type: compile error -> title: CPython fails to build modules with LLVM LTO on Mac OS -> CPython fails to build modules with LLVM LTO on Mac OS X components:
+ Build, - Extension Modules
nosy:
+ brett.cannon, ronaldoussoren, ned.deily versions:
+ Python 3.5, - Python 3.4 messages:
+ msg215344 |
2014-04-01 13:20:06 | Sjlver | set | messages:
+ msg215314 |
2014-04-01 13:16:15 | vstinner | set | messages:
+ msg215311 |
2014-04-01 12:14:56 | vstinner | set | nosy:
+ koobs
|
2014-04-01 12:14:50 | vstinner | set | nosy:
+ vstinner
|
2014-04-01 12:11:00 | Sjlver | create | |