This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Title: Bugs in parsedate_tz
Type: behavior Stage: resolved
Components: Library (Lib) Versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 2.7
Status: closed Resolution: fixed
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: r.david.murray Nosy List: barry, r.david.murray, therve, tzot
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2005-03-02 21:03 by therve, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)
msg24433 - (view) Author: Thomas Herve (therve) * Date: 2005-03-02 21:03
The parsing in emails is incomplete in both

For example, "Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:26:53+0800" is parsed
but "Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:26:53-0800" is not.

The problem is clear by watching the code : only "+"
timezones are corrected.
Following a patch :

Index :
@@ -60,7 +66,11 @@ def parsedate_tz(data):
         if i > 0:
             data[3:] = [s[:i], s[i+1:]]
-            data.append('') # Dummy tz
+           i = s.find('-')
+           if i > 0:
+               data[3:] = [s[:i], s[i:]]
+           else:
+               data.append('') # Dummy tz
     if len(data) < 5:
         return None
     data = data[:5]
msg24434 - (view) Author: Χρήστος Γεωργίου (Christos Georgiou) (tzot) * Date: 2005-03-20 11:48
Logged In: YES 

Note that parsedate_tz as of current parses correctly "Wed,
02 Mar 2005 09:26:53 -0800" (space before '-'), because
data.split() in line 43 produces five parts: [dow, date,
month, year, time, timezone] (reduced to four by removing
initial dow).   The function includes a special check for
"+" in the time part, and this patch adds the "-" check.

I didn't find any date header in my whole email and
newsgroup archive (12095 messages) missing the space before
[-+].  However, if mail clients or servers exist that
produce such date headers, patch should be applied and bug

Some test should be added too.  I updated
test_parsedate_no_dayofweek (line 2076 of
lib/email/test/ adding same test dropping the
space before '-', and test fails before patch, succeeds
after patch.  Perhaps a separate test case should be included.
msg24435 - (view) Author: Thomas Herve (therve) * Date: 2005-03-20 12:35
Logged In: YES 

In fact, the mails I've seen with this problem are likely to
be spam. 

I just thought it would be more logical to test both "+" and
"-" as "+" was already well parsed.
msg124568 - (view) Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * (Python committer) Date: 2010-12-23 20:41
Committed a slightly different patch in r87451, with tests.  Although I do consider this a bug fix, it hasn't apparently caused any problems in real life and does represent a slight behavior change, so I'm not backporting it.
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:56:10adminsetgithub: 41642
2010-12-23 20:41:17r.david.murraysetstatus: open -> closed
nosy: barry, tzot, therve, r.david.murray
messages: + msg124568

resolution: fixed
stage: test needed -> resolved
2010-08-21 12:31:36BreamoreBoysetversions: + Python 3.1, Python 2.7, Python 3.2, - Python 2.6
2010-05-05 13:48:18barrysetassignee: barry -> r.david.murray

nosy: + r.david.murray
2009-02-15 23:56:25ajaksu2setstage: test needed
type: behavior
versions: + Python 2.6, - Python 2.3
2005-03-02 21:03:14thervecreate