➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author collinwinter
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, collinwinter
Date 2009-05-20.01:31:10
SpamBayes Score 0.0004154621
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1242783073.43.0.508281070334.issue6066@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Lib/pickletools.py incorrectly thinks POP_MARK was part of protocol 0;
POP_MARK was only added with the introduction of protocol 1 in r7753.
This mistake led me down a dead end while fixing another pickling issue.

Alexandre, can you double-check me on this? Feel free to bounce this
back if you don't have time.

I'll port this to py3k. I'm leaning toward a backport to 2.6; any
thoughts on that?
History
Date User Action Args
2009-05-20 01:31:13collinwintersetrecipients: + collinwinter, alexandre.vassalotti
2009-05-20 01:31:13collinwintersetmessageid: <1242783073.43.0.508281070334.issue6066@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-05-20 01:31:11collinwinterlinkissue6066 messages
2009-05-20 01:31:11collinwintercreate