I made changes to my code and hit F5 to run it through IDLE. The code
appeared to run without any errors, but when I closed everything out and
ran it again it turned out to be full of errors.

I am able to replicate this problem with my code and have seen others
have the same problem, but its unclear when and what causes the caching
to take place. I created a test file that only contained "print hello".
I ran this, made changes and then ran it again. The changes were
reflected, but after testing my code, it still cached. 

Attached is a simple python file I used to test everything out. Run the
test, then comment out the Struct class and run it again. No errors
should appear, but if you close the code, reopen it and then run it
again it will error.

You are using IDLE with the "-n" option, so the same interpreter session
is reused each time you hit F5.

The second run works because the Struct from the first run is still
present - but disappears of course when you restart IDLE.

It's not really caching, but normal manipulation of variables, just like
"a = 5" followed by "print a" works because 'a' is saved in-between.

I suggest to remove this "-n" option, a fresh interpreter is started
each time you press F5, and errors appear sooner...

Reopening: the user did not choose the "-n" option; this option is 
always set when using "edit with IDLE" Windows shell command.

I tested this issue in Linux using the IDLE package (packed separately)
from Python. I was not able to reproduce this error, so it appears to be
with the Windows version of Python.

Amaury, from what I remember your suggestion has been applied some time
ago. Can you check if the newest Windows installer still adds an '-n' by
default ?

Can you guys let me know when this is fixed or thought to be fixed. I would
like to test from my end just to ensure.

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Guilherme Polo <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:

>
> Guilherme Polo <ggpolo@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Amaury, from what I remember your suggestion has been applied some time
> ago. Can you check if the newest Windows installer still adds an '-n' by
> default ?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4691>
> _______________________________________
>

Yes, the -n switch was removed from the Windows installer with r72335
(issue5847)

Given Amaury's last message, should this issue be closed as being resolved?