Currently, for a module that uses __future__ imports, the DATA section of `pydoc foo` contains these imports interspersed with the "real" data from the module.

Even though it is fully-featured _Feature objects that are imported, it probably makes sense to move them out of this section.

Reproduced on 3.11.

I thought that _Feature starts with an underscore precisely to evade such listings. Do other "private" module data also get listed?

It's like this:

>>> import foo
>>> dir(foo)
['__builtins__', '__cached__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__loader__', '__name__', '__package__', '__spec__', 'annotations', 'x']
>>> foo.annotations
_Feature((3, 7, 0, 'beta', 1), (3, 11, 0, 'alpha', 0), 16777216)


So the attribute in foo is called annotations, i.e. it's not private.

I am positive about this idea, but we must also think about the possible negative consequences. For example, the future annotations will be included in the star-import by default and can override some global names. The fact that some names not visible in the module help can override global names can be confusing.

I think it should be discussed with a wider auditory.

That's a good point. I see that the __future__ imports appear in the dir() of the module, and indeed they are imported with 'from m import *'. 

But I wonder if that is actually a bug. If you try this:


% cat x.py    

from __future__ import annotations

% cat y.py    
from x import *

print(dir())

class D:
    def f(self, a: D):
        return 42

% ./python.exe y.py    
['__annotations__', '__builtins__', '__cached__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__loader__', '__name__', '__package__', '__spec__', 'annotations']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython-654/y.py", line 5, in <module>
    class D:
    ^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython-654/y.py", line 6, in D
    def f(self, a: D):
                   ^
NameError: name 'D' is not defined
--------------------------------------------------


but if you add "from __future__ import annotations" at the top of y.py, then it does run.

So perhaps the future imports should be excluded by "from m import *"?

I once proposed to exclude modules from the star import by default, but this proposition was rejected. You can try, maybe your proposition will be more acceptable.

Module objects are not shown in the help unless they are submodules of the specified module, even if they are imported with the star import. With this precedence I think it is okay to exclude the __future__ annotations as well.

New changeset 15ba8167d78f9e66bd5b07c4e5cbb0463460310a by Irit Katriel in branch 'main':
bpo-26120: make pydoc exclude __future__ imports from the data block of the module (GH-30888)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/15ba8167d78f9e66bd5b07c4e5cbb0463460310a

Thank you, Serhiy!

I am sorry that I did not test the changes manually, but it seems that __future__ annotations are now disappeared from the pydoc output for the __future__ module help.

    $ ./python -m pydoc __future__

It is now difficult to get a list of available features from the help.

They should be kept in the DATA section for the __future__ module.

Yet one bug: PR 30888 only changed the text output. But there is also the html output generator.

> Yet one bug: PR 30888 only changed the text output. But there is also the html output generator.

I'm not sure - if I revert the change like this:

         if isinstance(getattr(obj, name, None), __future__._Feature):
-            return False
+            pass # return False


then test_html_doc fails:


======================================================================
FAIL: test_html_doc (test.test_pydoc.PydocDocTest.test_html_doc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/Lib/test/test_pydoc.py", line 414, in test_html_doc
    self.assertEqual(text_lines, expected_lines)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: Lists differ: ['tes[1392 chars]t]', "print_function = _Feature((2, 6, 0, 'alp[156 chars]ody'] != ['tes[1392 chars]t]', 'type_union1 = typing.Union[int, str]', '[72 chars]ody']

First differing element 55:
"print_function = _Feature((2, 6, 0, 'alp[36 chars]576)"
'type_union1 = typing.Union[int, str]'

First list contains 1 additional elements.
First extra element 61:
'Nobody'

  ['test.pydoc_mod (version 1.2.3.4)',
   'This is a test module for test_pydoc',
   'Modules',
   'types',
   'typing',
   'Classes',
   'builtins.object',
   'A',
   'B',
   'C',
   'class A(builtins.object)',
   'Hello and goodbye',
   'Methods defined here:',
   '__init__()',
   'Wow, I have no function!',
   'Data descriptors defined here:',
   '__dict__',
   'dictionary for instance variables (if defined)',
   '__weakref__',
   'list of weak references to the object (if defined)',
   'class B(builtins.object)',
   'Data descriptors defined here:',
   '__dict__',
   'dictionary for instance variables (if defined)',
   '__weakref__',
   'list of weak references to the object (if defined)',
   'Data and other attributes defined here:',
   "NO_MEANING = 'eggs'",
   "__annotations__ = {'NO_MEANING': <class 'str'>}",
   'class C(builtins.object)',
   'Methods defined here:',
   'get_answer(self)',
   'Return say_no()',
   'is_it_true(self)',
   'Return self.get_answer()',
   'say_no(self)',
   'Class methods defined here:',
   '__class_getitem__(item) from builtins.type',
   'Data descriptors defined here:',
   '__dict__',
   'dictionary for instance variables (if defined)',
   '__weakref__',
   'list of weak references to the object (if defined)',
   'Functions',
   'doc_func()',
   "This function solves all of the world's problems:",
   'hunger',
   'lack of Python',
   'war',
   'nodoc_func()',
   'Data',
   "__xyz__ = 'X, Y and Z'",
   'c_alias = test.pydoc_mod.C[int]',
   'list_alias1 = typing.List[int]',
   'list_alias2 = list[int]',
-  "print_function = _Feature((2, 6, 0, 'alpha', 2), (3, 0, 0, 'alpha', 0), "
-  '1048576)',
   'type_union1 = typing.Union[int, str]',
   'type_union2 = int | str',
   'Author',
   'Benjamin Peterson',
   'Credits',
   'Nobody']

> Yet one bug: PR 30888 only changed the text output. But there is also the html output generator.

Sorry, I was wrong. The changed code is common for all generators. Perhaps I tested with wrong version.

New changeset 63f32fae79e16e6dc71777bd3fcb623b2c3ff742 by Irit Katriel in branch 'main':
bpo-26120: do not exclude __future__ import in pydoc of the __future__ module itself (GH-32180)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/63f32fae79e16e6dc71777bd3fcb623b2c3ff742