Created on 2011-04-09 23:37 by pitrou, last changed 2011-04-12 16:01 by pitrou. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| cfsimplify.patch | pitrou, 2011-04-09 23:37 | review | ||
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg133435 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *  |
Date: 2011-04-09 23:37 | |
Queue.get(block=True) cannot raise EmptyError, meaning there's some dead code that we can remove. |
|||
| msg133436 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * |
Date: 2011-04-09 23:45 | |
A further optimization would be to use a SimpleQueue (from multiprocessing.queues) for the result_queue in the ProcessPoolExecutor. A SimpleQueue is much more light-weight than a normal Queue, which has a bunch of additional locks and a dedicated thread. |
|||
| msg133584 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) | Date: 2011-04-12 15:50 | |
New changeset bfc586c558ed by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.2': Issue #11815: Remove dead code in concurrent.futures (since a blocking Queue http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bfc586c558ed New changeset eb751e3cb753 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #11815: Remove dead code in concurrent.futures (since a blocking Queue http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eb751e3cb753 |
|||
| msg133587 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) | Date: 2011-04-12 15:58 | |
New changeset c26d015cbde8 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #11815: Use a light-weight SimpleQueue for the result queue in concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c26d015cbde8 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-04-12 16:01:33 | pitrou | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2011-04-12 15:58:16 | python-dev | set | messages: + msg133587 |
| 2011-04-12 15:50:28 | python-dev | set | nosy:
+ python-dev messages: + msg133584 |
| 2011-04-09 23:45:13 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg133436 |
| 2011-04-09 23:37:46 | pitrou | create | |