This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients Alexander.Belopolsky, l0nwlf, loewis, michael.foord, orsenthil, ronaldoussoren
Date 2010-02-21.18:58:36
SpamBayes Score 2.2339277e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> I would suggest using my _DARWIN_C_SOURCE implementation
> unconditionally and make similar changes to posix_setgroups, but this
> is probably a subject for a separate issue.

I would propose a different strategy: if _SC_NGROUPS_MAX is defined, use
that to find out how much memory to allocate, otherwise, fall back to
the current max array size. Can you find out whether doing so would also
fix the issue at hand?
Date User Action Args
2010-02-21 18:58:38loewissetrecipients: + loewis, ronaldoussoren, orsenthil, michael.foord, Alexander.Belopolsky, l0nwlf
2010-02-21 18:58:36loewislinkissue7900 messages
2010-02-21 18:58:36loewiscreate