Message 99560 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	orsenthil
Recipients	ezio.melotti, mbloore, orsenthil, r.david.murray
Date	2010-02-19.07:47:29
SpamBayes Score	1.667952e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1266565652.2.0.872228816519.issue7904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Fixed in the r78234 and merged back to other branches. I fell back to RFC's definition of scheme, as anything before the ://. I did not see the need to add s3 specifically as a valid scheme type, because s3 itself is not registered a schemetype. So, the fix should work for s3 and other undefined schemes as per RFC. Thanks for the patch.

Fixed in the r78234 and merged back to other branches.
I fell back to RFC's definition of scheme, as anything before the ://.
I did not see the need to add s3 specifically as a valid scheme type, because s3 itself is not registered a schemetype.
So, the fix should work for s3 and other undefined schemes as per RFC.

Thanks for the patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-02-19 07:47:32	orsenthil	set	recipients: + orsenthil, ezio.melotti, mbloore, r.david.murray
2010-02-19 07:47:32	orsenthil	set	messageid: <1266565652.2.0.872228816519.issue7904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-02-19 07:47:30	orsenthil	link	issue7904 messages
2010-02-19 07:47:29	orsenthil	create