Message 97699 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	lekma
Recipients	lekma, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date	2010-01-13.08:32:43
SpamBayes Score	6.275845e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1263371570.6.0.184435661325.issue7523@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> lekma, do you have a real name that we should add to the ACKS file? no, lekma is fine (that's a nick I carry since childhood) > Looking at it again, there's the question of accept() behaviour. [...] Sorry for not having seen that earlier and thanks for pointing it out to me. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a portable solution. We could restrict the patch to linux 2.6.28 and above (there is already an awful lot of ifdefs in this file). If you think that's the way to go, I can rework the patch, otherwise I think it's better to close the issue (maybe reopen when bsds catch up, if ever). Ideas?

> lekma, do you have a real name that we should add to the ACKS file?
no, lekma is fine (that's a nick I carry since childhood)

> Looking at it again, there's the question of accept() behaviour. [...]
Sorry for not having seen that earlier and thanks for pointing it out to me.
Unfortunately, I don't think there is a portable solution. We could restrict the patch to linux 2.6.28 and above (there is already an awful lot of ifdefs in this file).
If you think that's the way to go, I can rework the patch, otherwise I think it's better to close the issue (maybe reopen when bsds catch up, if ever).
Ideas?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-01-13 08:32:50	lekma	set	recipients: + lekma, pitrou, r.david.murray
2010-01-13 08:32:50	lekma	set	messageid: <1263371570.6.0.184435661325.issue7523@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-01-13 08:32:44	lekma	link	issue7523 messages
2010-01-13 08:32:43	lekma	create