Author pitrou
Recipients lucifer, nirai, pitrou
Date 2010-01-03.15:10:10
SpamBayes Score 0.00190629
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1262531412.64.0.593480369453.issue7610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't think we can remove the "U" option from 2.6/2.7; it was certainly introduced for a reason and isn't inconsistent with the "U" option to the built-in open().

On 3.x, behaviour is indeed inconsistent with the standard IO library, so maybe we can either wrap the object in a TextIOWrapper, or remove support for "U".
History
Date User Action Args
2010-01-03 15:10:12pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, nirai, lucifer
2010-01-03 15:10:12pitrousetmessageid: <1262531412.64.0.593480369453.issue7610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-01-03 15:10:11pitroulinkissue7610 messages
2010-01-03 15:10:11pitroucreate