This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, bamby, exarkun, gvanrossum, laca, movement, mstepnicki, pitrou, ross
Date 2009-12-14.15:11:17
SpamBayes Score 0.0010401526
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1260803515.3360.2.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>
> I don't like the suggestion to lower the timeout to select().  Lots of
> the rest of the world is pushing towards removing this kind of periodic
> polling (generally with the goal of improving power consumption). 

Yes, I'm aware of this. I was only suggesting the easiest solution to
the problem at hand :-)
Date User Action Args
2009-12-14 15:11:19pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, exarkun, Rhamphoryncus, movement, ross, bamby, laca, mstepnicki
2009-12-14 15:11:17pitroulinkissue1975 messages
2009-12-14 15:11:17pitroucreate