Author janssen
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, ddvoinikov, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, josiah.carlson, josiahcarlson, qwavel, srid
Date 2009-09-29.23:09:45
SpamBayes Score 2.25341e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1254265787.09.0.0769425871332.issue3890@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I wonder if there is any way to test this, aside from the tests that
are already in the test suite?  The bug here is that the code effectively
does a blocking read on a non-blocking socket, and we can't tell the
difference.  The fact that this patch passes all the existing tests and
also seems to be a fix (through inspection) may have to be sufficient.

After all, the tests for the previous SSL support (Python 2.5 and
earlier) were extremely sketchy.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-09-29 23:09:47janssensetrecipients: + janssen, barry, josiahcarlson, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, giampaolo.rodola, josiah.carlson, ddvoinikov, srid, qwavel
2009-09-29 23:09:47janssensetmessageid: <1254265787.09.0.0769425871332.issue3890@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-09-29 23:09:45janssenlinkissue3890 messages
2009-09-29 23:09:45janssencreate