Message92100
The small deficiency with these patches is that the specified
server_hostname is almost always the hostname that is used in the socket
pair of connect. Is it appropriate to grab the hostname value and use it
in the SNI extension header? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-08-31 06:04:14 | grooverdan | set | recipients:
+ grooverdan, janssen, pdp |
2009-08-31 06:04:14 | grooverdan | set | messageid: <1251698654.46.0.450709750915.issue5639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-08-31 06:04:13 | grooverdan | link | issue5639 messages |
2009-08-31 06:04:13 | grooverdan | create | |
|