This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients Arfrever, exarkun, gpolo, loewis
Date 2009-08-20.22:20:09
SpamBayes Score 0.000106033
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> When building of an extension has failed due to external reasons (e.g.
> headers from too old version of a Python dependency), user might prefer
> to be forced to fix these reasons, than to have Python built without an
> extension.

Ok - but your patch does not implement that. If the extension fails to
compile because the header files are not installed at all, even with
your patch, there is no error indication. So according to your
requirements, your patch is incorrect.
Date User Action Args
2009-08-20 22:20:11loewissetrecipients: + loewis, exarkun, gpolo, Arfrever
2009-08-20 22:20:09loewislinkissue6731 messages
2009-08-20 22:20:09loewiscreate