This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients Arfrever, exarkun, gpolo, loewis
Date 2009-08-19.21:02:34
SpamBayes Score 7.07451e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> If it's not a problem, then the invoker doesn't need to check the exit
> code of  Why are you resistant to exposing more information?

Because I believe that the information that is being exposed in this
patch is confusing, and will trick people into believing things that
actually don't happen. When they then try to track down the problems,
they will (then rightly) complain that the implemented behavior is
Date User Action Args
2009-08-19 21:02:35loewissetrecipients: + loewis, exarkun, gpolo, Arfrever
2009-08-19 21:02:34loewislinkissue6731 messages
2009-08-19 21:02:34loewiscreate