Author gvanrossum
Recipients Red HamsterX, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, gvanrossum, pitrou, r.david.murray, sanxiyn
Date 2009-07-29.17:55:45
SpamBayes Score 2.96411e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1248890147.35.0.692190734224.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
It strikes me as simply a documentation bug. Maybe whoever wrote the
docs just assumed it would work that way. I expect that changing it to
insist on valid input would break some use cases. If you want a
validating API, perhaps a new API could be added that validates as well
as converts.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-07-29 17:55:47gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, amaury.forgeotdarc, sanxiyn, pitrou, ajaksu2, r.david.murray, Red HamsterX
2009-07-29 17:55:47gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1248890147.35.0.692190734224.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-07-29 17:55:46gvanrossumlinkissue1466065 messages
2009-07-29 17:55:45gvanrossumcreate