Message91055
It strikes me as simply a documentation bug. Maybe whoever wrote the
docs just assumed it would work that way. I expect that changing it to
insist on valid input would break some use cases. If you want a
validating API, perhaps a new API could be added that validates as well
as converts. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-07-29 17:55:47 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, amaury.forgeotdarc, sanxiyn, pitrou, ajaksu2, r.david.murray, Red HamsterX |
2009-07-29 17:55:47 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1248890147.35.0.692190734224.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-07-29 17:55:46 | gvanrossum | link | issue1466065 messages |
2009-07-29 17:55:45 | gvanrossum | create | |
|