Message90718
If you look at the docs for the unittest.expectedFailure decorator you
will notice it shows a set of empty parentheses since it is set with a
function directive. But since it's a decorator those empty parentheses
are not accurate.
If you want to view the docs as showing common usage -- like the docs
for the other decorators in unittest -- then those empty parentheses
need to go. An @ should also probably be added as well.
But if you view it more as how the decorator is called -- like with
importlib.util.module_for_loader does -- then it should have an argument
for the callable being passed in. This would also mean that all the
other decorators in unittest need a second set of parentheses taking a
callable as their argument as well.
Perhaps it's time we added a decorator directive that adds the @ sign
and does not insert empty parentheses? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-07-20 01:15:10 | brett.cannon | set | recipients:
+ brett.cannon, georg.brandl |
2009-07-20 01:15:10 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1248052510.55.0.186681984589.issue6522@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-07-20 01:15:09 | brett.cannon | link | issue6522 messages |
2009-07-20 01:15:08 | brett.cannon | create | |
|