This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients benjamin.peterson, hagen, ncoghlan
Date 2009-06-16.13:44:20
SpamBayes Score 8.2843535e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1245159862.19.0.590146858904.issue6288@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
That's a good point actually - with 3.1's "in-between" status and the
lack of deprecation in 2.6, nested() is going to have to stick around
for 2.7/3.2 anyway.

So PendingDeprecation now with full deprecation in 2.7/3.2 when we will
hopefully have a better alternative in place is probably the way to go.

Updating the docs to cover only the recommended use case is still
something I want to do this week though (hopefully tomorrow).
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-16 13:44:22ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, hagen
2009-06-16 13:44:22ncoghlansetmessageid: <1245159862.19.0.590146858904.issue6288@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-06-16 13:44:20ncoghlanlinkissue6288 messages
2009-06-16 13:44:20ncoghlancreate