Message 89315 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	conf
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, conf, ncoghlan, trott
Date	2009-06-13.04:48:44
SpamBayes Score	0.0010947164
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1244868527.3.0.532442123499.issue5811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
There's a problem with my patch... When the size of the data we want to peek is too big ( > buffer_len - start ) the cursor will move, thus there isn't a case where the peek function would work properly (except when we want to peek() just 1 byte). Couldn't we use a read() followed by a seek() instead?

There's a problem with my patch... When the size of the data we want to
peek is too big ( > buffer_len - start ) the cursor will move, thus
there isn't a case where the peek function would work properly (except
when we want to peek() just 1 byte).
Couldn't we use a read() followed by a seek() instead?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-06-13 04:48:48	conf	set	recipients: + conf, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, trott
2009-06-13 04:48:47	conf	set	messageid: <1244868527.3.0.532442123499.issue5811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-06-13 04:48:45	conf	link	issue5811 messages
2009-06-13 04:48:44	conf	create