Author gvanrossum
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, gvanrossum, hagen, mkiever, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2009-06-09.19:26:39
SpamBayes Score 1.21245e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <ca471dc20906091226p2888bdb9t585cdbf96c54c224@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1244575125.4424.1.camel@localhost>
Content
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Antoine Pitrou<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>> Ah. How about only doing back-translation when protocol=2 (or lower)
>> is explicitly selected?
>
> Well, this is exactly what is implemented!

Ah, I missed that. Fine then!

>> I don't much like that 3.0 will be to read pickles written by 3.1 with
>> the default protocol (i.e. 3),
>
> I suppose you meant to say "will be unable",

Indeed.

> but it isn't, since
> protocol 3 pickles are not affected at all by this patch.

Good.

So I'm okay with the status quo -- too bad 3.0 can't read those
pickles, but that's the deal with abandoning 3.0...
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-09 19:26:41gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, mkiever, alexandre.vassalotti, hagen
2009-06-09 19:26:39gvanrossumlinkissue6137 messages
2009-06-09 19:26:39gvanrossumcreate