This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pmoody
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, shields
Date 2009-06-02.06:51:11
SpamBayes Score 0.00418292
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <8517e9350906012350qbf035fboabb37390e920f700@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <8657ee3f0906012334h2653205fo73c5182be43db795@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> I should think you would seek the opinion of those developers who
> actually do have plans to use an IP address library.

That's what this has been doing for the last 8 1/2 months.

> As far as I can
> tell, every developer in that category, outside of Google, that has
> commented on this issue here or in python-dev has advocated a
> different API.

Is there some sort of conspiracy theory-ish reason that a google
software engineer might be somehow unfairly influenced?

Cheers,
/peter
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-02 06:52:01pmoodysetrecipients: + pmoody, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pnasrat, r.david.murray, oubiwann, claymation
2009-06-02 06:51:49pmoodylinkissue3959 messages
2009-06-02 06:51:36pmoodycreate