Author loewis
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, shields
Date 2009-06-01.20:54:53
SpamBayes Score 0.00624364
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> ipaddr makes no distinction between two fundamentally different
> concepts -- to my mind, that is a serious flaw.

Do you have an application in mind where this lack of distinction
would prevent writing the application in a straight-forward way?
IOW, could you do something if they were distinct that you can't
do because they are not?
Date User Action Args
2009-06-01 20:54:55loewissetrecipients: + loewis, gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, oubiwann, claymation
2009-06-01 20:54:53loewislinkissue3959 messages
2009-06-01 20:54:53loewiscreate