Author pitrou
Recipients ajaksu2, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, seesee
Date 2009-05-16.09:07:02
SpamBayes Score 2.85426e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1242464943.5380.17.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>
> Is it okay with everyone to close this as "wont fix"?  (BTW, is there
> some reason that the Resolution field isn't allowed to have an
> apostrophe in it?)  There's nothing we can do about 2.6.2;  it appears
> 2.6.3 wasn't imminent, and as Raymond says it seems disruptive to
> switch it back now.

Well, the harm is done, unfortunately, and both resolutions have
analogous downsides, so we might indeed close it.
Date User Action Args
2009-05-16 09:07:04pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, georg.brandl, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, seesee
2009-05-16 09:07:02pitroulinkissue5786 messages
2009-05-16 09:07:02pitroucreate