Author mark.dickinson
Recipients MrJean1, alanmcintyre, donmez, facundobatista, giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, mark.dickinson, r.david.murray
Date 2009-05-08.18:53:36
SpamBayes Score 5.26179e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1241808817.71.0.634048945939.issue5798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
With Giampaolo's suggested change, all tests pass.  My understanding of 
what asyncore/asynchat is intended to do and how it might be used in 
practice is weak, so I don't feel qualified to comment on the 
correctness of the change.

> One of the issues with using the method that Giampaolo describes, 
which 
> I explained to him, is that generally if someone sends you data, you 
> want to receive it.  You can get both data and the signal that someone 
> disconnected, in particular, with asynchat's .close_when_done() 
method.

Is it possible to add a test for this sort of situation, to make sure 
that future changes take it into account?
History
Date User Action Args
2009-05-08 18:53:37mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, facundobatista, josiahcarlson, alanmcintyre, giampaolo.rodola, donmez, MrJean1, r.david.murray
2009-05-08 18:53:37mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1241808817.71.0.634048945939.issue5798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-05-08 18:53:36mark.dickinsonlinkissue5798 messages
2009-05-08 18:53:36mark.dickinsoncreate