Author eric.smith
Recipients ajaksu2, eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark, mark.dickinson
Date 2009-05-02.19:57:52
SpamBayes Score 3.28124e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Hmm.  That also seems wrong to me.  So I guess it's a suggestion
> for float as well, which means it's not specific to this issue.
> Should I open a separate feature request?

Yes, this is a separate issue. It comes from PEP 3101's specification of 
"like 'g' but different" for floats with no specified presentation type.
Date User Action Args
2009-05-02 19:57:53eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, ajaksu2, mark
2009-05-02 19:57:52eric.smithlinkissue1588 messages
2009-05-02 19:57:52eric.smithcreate