Author mark.dickinson
Recipients ajaksu2, eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark, mark.dickinson
Date 2009-04-28.09:32:19
SpamBayes Score 1.64315e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1240911141.34.0.155123508191.issue1588@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I'm also going to disallow the '%' format code.

Sounds good to me.

> I don't think it makes any sense to convert a complex number to a
> percentage.

Well, I think it's clear what the numbers would be (just scale both real
and imaginary parts by 100 before using fixed-point formatting).  The
real issue whether to have two trailing '%'s or one.

Just being difficult:  I completely agree that '%' should be disallowed
for complex numbers.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-04-28 09:32:21mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, gvanrossum, eric.smith, ajaksu2, mark
2009-04-28 09:32:21mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1240911141.34.0.155123508191.issue1588@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-04-28 09:32:20mark.dickinsonlinkissue1588 messages
2009-04-28 09:32:19mark.dickinsoncreate