Author eric.smith
Recipients ajaksu2, eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark, mark.dickinson
Date 2009-04-27.17:06:59
SpamBayes Score 4.06466e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> More specifically, how about allowing widths, and the
> '<', '>' and '^' alignment specifiers, but not '=', or
> '0' for zero-padding.

That sounds correct.

> I suppose that thousands separators should be permitted
> here too?  Though it's difficult to imagine anyone actually
> using them.  If we allow ',' but not '0' then we avoid
> the crazy zero-padding--thousands-separators interaction.

That was my thinking, too.
Date User Action Args
2009-04-27 17:07:00eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, ajaksu2, mark
2009-04-27 17:06:59eric.smithlinkissue1588 messages
2009-04-27 17:06:59eric.smithcreate