Author eric.smith
Recipients ajaksu2, eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark, mark.dickinson
Date 2009-04-27.16:58:29
SpamBayes Score 1.44155e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <38432.63.251.87.214.1240851507.squirrel@mail.trueblade.com>
In-reply-to <1240851112.76.0.198463429929.issue1588@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I don't see any problem with dealing with width, alignment
> and padding with a user-specified fill character;  I think we
> should keep these if possible.  It's just zero padding where
> it's not clear what should happen.

You're correct. It's just zero padding that would be disabled.

> For the bits that are disabled (e.g., zero padding), should
> there be a ValueError raised, or do those bits just get
> silently ignored?

I think a ValueError would be best. That way if we decide to give it some
meaning in the future, we know it won't change any working code.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-04-27 16:58:31eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, ajaksu2, mark
2009-04-27 16:58:29eric.smithlinkissue1588 messages
2009-04-27 16:58:29eric.smithcreate