Author stutzbach
Recipients cdavid, cito, dino.viehland, eric.smith, mark.dickinson, stutzbach
Date 2009-04-17.16:19:27
SpamBayes Score 2.51279e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1239985169.85.0.191283961745.issue4482@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I used 'inf' instead of "+inf' because the original bug report states
that the docs say it should be 'inf'.

Now that I actually look at the docs, I don't agree with the original
report's interpretation and agree that '+inf' is better.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-04-17 16:19:30stutzbachsetrecipients: + stutzbach, mark.dickinson, cito, eric.smith, cdavid, dino.viehland
2009-04-17 16:19:29stutzbachsetmessageid: <1239985169.85.0.191283961745.issue4482@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-04-17 16:19:28stutzbachlinkissue4482 messages
2009-04-17 16:19:28stutzbachcreate