Author r.david.murray
Recipients jvdias, r.david.murray, r.david.murray
Date 2009-04-14.01:00:56
SpamBayes Score 9.4369e-16
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904131956580.26362@kimball.webabinitio.net>
In-reply-to <200904101332.21982.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
Content
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 at 09:29, jvdias wrote:
> jvdias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Thanks for responding !

You are welcome.  If you want something to happen, though,
you'll have to get support from the community and submit
a patch.

> Can't Python provide a better print() implementation or a fflush()
> implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed ?
> Perhaps something like PERL's IO::Handle::autoflush() ?

Is there some way in which sys.stdout.flush() is not equivalent to "an
fflush implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed"?

> Maybe I should raise another "fflush() support required" bug ?

If it's a real issue, yes.  But I don't think it is.

--David
History
Date User Action Args
2009-04-14 01:00:59r.david.murray-oldsetrecipients: + r.david.murray-old, r.david.murray, jvdias
2009-04-14 01:00:58r.david.murray-oldlinkissue5725 messages
2009-04-14 01:00:57r.david.murray-oldcreate