Author pitrou
Recipients gregory.p.smith, michael.foord, pitrou, rbcollins
Date 2009-04-04.22:09:12
SpamBayes Score 1.05821e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1238883040.6865.28.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1238882210.77.0.991586339971.issue5679@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
teardown

Why should they? It's only an implementation choice, and not a wise one
I would say (precisely because people are used to the fact that the
standard tearDown() method does nothing, and doesn't need to be called).

I explained my proposal in terms of actual use cases, but I don't see
any actual use case of addCleanup() in your argument.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-04-04 22:09:13pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, rbcollins, michael.foord
2009-04-04 22:09:12pitroulinkissue5679 messages
2009-04-04 22:09:12pitroucreate