Message8515
Logged In: YES
user_id=412110
The test suite already uses $PATH to *run* ls (as does other
software, which is why I don't get into a lot of trouble).
It merely uses /bin/ls as a filename to pass to ls so it can
check the output. Any other filename will do just as well
here, and the fix is extremely simple; what's the benefit of
listing /bin/ls in particular that makes it worth risk
breaking on systems like this? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 13:58:24 | admin | link | issue497160 messages |
2007-08-23 13:58:24 | admin | create | |
|