Message 83925 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	lemburg
Recipients	andersch, lemburg, loewis
Date	2009-03-21.09:40:07
SpamBayes Score	4.858313e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1237628409.49.0.0191517288557.issue1498930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
You may not know it, but these functions are generated from the Unicode database. However, because these functions need to be fast and are small enough, they were not converted to the unicodetype_db approach and instead left as they were originally implemented: as switch statements for the compilers to optimize. Is there any reason why this would need to change for Unicode 5.0 ?

You may not know it, but these functions are generated from the Unicode
database. 

However, because these functions need to be fast and are small enough,
they were not converted to the unicodetype_db approach and instead left
as they were originally implemented: as switch statements for the
compilers to optimize.

Is there any reason why this would need to change for Unicode 5.0 ?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-03-21 09:40:09	lemburg	set	recipients: + lemburg, loewis, andersch
2009-03-21 09:40:09	lemburg	set	messageid: <1237628409.49.0.0191517288557.issue1498930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-03-21 09:40:08	lemburg	link	issue1498930 messages
2009-03-21 09:40:07	lemburg	create