➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author collinwinter
Recipients collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jyasskin, lauromoura, nnorwitz, phsilva, pitrou, rhettinger, tzot
Date 2009-02-21.00:30:57
SpamBayes Score 3.2818159e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <43aa6ff70902201630k321da513xe51cd7c0f5ff8d42@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <43aa6ff70902131523o12b76651x754b86939123db97@mail.gmail.com>
Content 
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Collin Winter <collinw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>> Before committing I want to know what to do with the new jump opcodes,
>> with respect to the alternative proposal I've made in #4715.
>> Ideally, I should fold the #4715 patch back into the present patch,
>> since I think the #4715 approach is more thought out.
>
> That sounds good, especially since Jeffrey and I have already reviewed #4715.

If you don't have the bandwidth to integrate 4715 into this patch, I
can do that, if you want.

Collin
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-21 00:31:01collinwintersetrecipients: + collinwinter, nnorwitz, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, jcea, tzot, pitrou, jyasskin, lauromoura, phsilva
2009-02-21 00:30:58collinwinterlinkissue2459 messages
2009-02-21 00:30:57collinwintercreate