Message82162
Note that:
This bug now is tracked in Fedora as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236535
The root of the problem on Fedora is that SElinux will give noisy
warnings if python tries to to access or create non-existing foo.pyo for
a packaged foo.py. Fedoras solution to this is to always create and
package .pyo files to which proper SElinux labels can be attached. The
.pyo files are automatically created by
/usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile behind the scenes when a rpm is
build. The problem is that bdist_rpm only knows and lists the .pyo files
created by setup and thus doesn't include the brp-python-bytecompile .pyos.
It could be argued that Fedora thus enforces a custom policy on RPM, and
it should be Fedoras job to complete that job and patch bdist_rpm to
match that custom policy. See the pending patch at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236535#c20
However, it would be nice if Python distutils acknowledged that
downstream Fedora has a special need here and helped solving it. Perhaps
the patch could be accepted in distutils so that bdist_rpm always runs
setup with -O1? Or some other change that could make it easy to
configure/customize distutils to match the platforms needs ...
Finally, note that Fedora and Red Hat (and apparently also Suse and
Mandriva) uses rpm.org, and rpm5 is a competing fork. (Rpm5 probably
claims that rpm.org is the evil guys who forked.)
Tarek, I assume you meant you are creating a Fedora 10 or RHEL/CentOS 5 VM?
I will be glad to help testing and answering further questions. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-15 17:29:02 | kiilerix | set | recipients:
+ kiilerix, twegener, nshmyrev, pitrou, forest, tarek, ebfe, jbaker |
2009-02-15 17:29:02 | kiilerix | set | messageid: <1234718942.79.0.352531848457.issue1533164@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-02-15 17:29:01 | kiilerix | link | issue1533164 messages |
2009-02-15 17:29:00 | kiilerix | create | |
|